Tuesday, February 2, 2010

80's D&D cartoon: Designed to Make Kids Mindless Followers?

Pertinent quote from the guy who designed it"

"The kids were all heroic — all but a semi-heroic member of their troupe named Eric. Eric was a whiner, a complainer, a guy who didn't like to go along with whatever the others wanted to do. Usually, he would grudgingly agree to participate, and it would always turn out well, and Eric would be glad he joined in. He was the one thing I really didn't like about the show.

So why, you may wonder, did I leave him in there? Answer: I had to.

As you may know, there are those out there who attempt to influence the content of childrens' television. We call them "parents groups," although many are not comprised of parents, or at least not of folks whose primary interest is as parents. Study them and you'll find a wide array of agendum at work...and I suspect that, in some cases, their stated goals are far from their real goals.

Nevertheless, they all seek to make kidvid more enriching and redeeming, at least by their definitions, and at the time, they had enough clout to cause the networks to yield. Consultants were brought in and we, the folks who were writing cartoons, were ordered to include certain "pro-social" morals in our shows. At the time, the dominant "pro-social" moral was as follows: The group is always right...the complainer is always wrong.

This was the message of way too many eighties' cartoon shows. If all your friends want to go get pizza and you want a burger, you should bow to the will of the majority and go get pizza with them. There was even a show for one season on CBS called The Get-Along Gang, which was dedicated unabashedly to this principle. Each week, whichever member of the gang didn't get along with the gang learned the error of his or her ways.

We were forced to insert this "lesson" in D & D, which is why Eric was always saying, "I don't want to do that" and paying for his social recalcitrance. I thought it was forced and repetitive, but I especially objected to the lesson. I don't believe you should always go along with the group. What about thinking for yourself? What about developing your own personality and viewpoint? What about doing things because you decide they're the right thing to do, not because the majority ruled and you got outvoted?

We weren't allowed to teach any of that. We had to teach kids to join gangs. And then to do whatever the rest of the gang wanted to do.

What a stupid thing to teach children.

Now, I won't make the leap to charge that gang activity, of the Crips and Bloods variety, increased on account of these programs. That influential, I don't believe a cartoon show could ever be. I just think that "pro-social" message was bogus and ill-conceived. End of confession."

From:

http://www.povonline.com/cols/COL145.htm

7 comments:

  1. Thanks for posting that. Eric was always such a dick. He was the Cavalier in the cartoon, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. My suspicions confirmed regarding Outcome Based Education and that dreck they spoon-feed kids.

    Spooky stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pro-social? I prefer 'Si omnes, ego non'

    ReplyDelete
  4. One of my eight year old nephews and I just finished watching the entire series together on DVD. I've been meaning to quiz him about his likes/dislikes of the show... I wonder what he'll say about good old Ralph the Malph Eric.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That is a really interesting quote. Makes me glad I am not in the television business and I didn't have a TV growing up!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's bothered me for a long time. Here we're supposed to be a country built on rugged individualism, and the message we sent our kids (and still do!) is that people who don't conform are unlikable and always find unhappiness and failure until they join the collective.

    I've been trying to raise my daughter to think for herself, but it's uphill battle. Television programming hasn't really gotten any better in the last 20 years (have any of you seen Ni Hao, Kai-Lan?) and her school is "progressive", meaning they accept uncritically whatever liberal notion is currently popular and brook no disagreement with the groupthink.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.